Choices, choices

By J. Kingston Pierce

You knew this was coming, right?

Even though Republican’ts tried to exploit America’s not-always-hidden racism against Democrat Barack Obama, first lady Laura Bush -- struggling to halt criticism of John McCain’s not-ready-for-primetime veep pick, Sarah Palin -- is now warning Dems against launching sexist attacks against her. That possibility is “something we all looked at,” Mrs. Bush told Politico.

Well, sorry, Mrs. Bush, but pointing out that Palin isn’t qualified to be vice president of the United States is not sexist. It’s legitimate political commentary. Chiding McCain for extremely poor judgment in selecting the Alaska governor as his running mate is not sexist. Questioning the McCain camp’s inadequate vetting of their neophyte number two is not sexist. Deriding Palin for her ideological extremism is not sexist. In fact, I haven’t seen any examples of sexist attacks on Sarah Palin, though there may be some fringe misogynists out there who think insulting women is a good idea. (Kind of like McCain making fun of Chelsea Clinton in 1998.) It’s Republican’ts who are infamous for taking cheap shots at their opponents, Mrs. Bush, and then telling others that is beneath their honor to follow suit.

No doubt Mrs. Bush is trying to head off even more criticism of Palin, now that it’s been revealed that the governor’s unmarried 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, is pregnant. Can you imagine what the right wing’s reaction would be, were Barack Obama’s elder daughter 17 and bearing a child without the prior exchange of “I do’s”? They’d be calling her “black trash,” and dubbing her a “whore” and a “slut.” Or... what’s that word McCain used to describe his own wife? Oh, yeah, “cunt.” They’d fire off every hateful salvo against the Democrat’s daughter without a moment’s hesitation or shame. But now that the baby shoe is on the other foot, what does the GOP do? It sends Laura Bush out to chide Dems for undemonstrated sexism.

Sadly, the media are suckers for this sort of shell game. They’ve been conned by Republican’ts for so long, they have forgotten what it means to think for themselves. No doubt they’ll pick up this dubious caution against sexism and go looking for it in every phantom example uttered by prominent Dems between now and November 4. Meanwhile, they’ll encourage the Republican’t double-standard bearer, McCain, to defend this woman he wants to keep down at his foot for the next four years.

As if that arrangement can be called anything but sexist...

One other important thing: In defending Bristol Palin, the McCain campaign made special mention of the fact that she “made the decision on her own to keep the baby.” That is a bone tossed to members of the rabid religious right, who might otherwise froth at the lips over this teenage pregnancy (as they might be justified in going apoplectic over McCain’s multiple marital infidelities). However, it highlights another issue, too, which Steve Benen mentioned this morning:

[I]f McCain has his way in office, the choice wouldn’t be up to her at all. Roe would be overturned, and reproductive rights would be dramatically curtailed for every woman in America. Indeed, it’s not just McCain--Sarah Palin told Alaskans during her gubernatorial campaign that she wouldn’t support abortion rights even if her own daughter had been raped.

The best choice Americans can make is to defeat John McCain and Sarah Palin in November.

(Cross-posted at Limbo.)

The Palin Trap

By Creature

It's comments like this that are part of the "Palin Trap" the McCain-Rove team were counting on:

“There’s a gigantic difference between John McCain and Barack Obama and between me and I suspect my vice presidential opponent,” Biden said at an outdoor rally Sunday, getting ready to hit the GOP ticket for their economic policies.

“She’s good-looking,” he quipped.

Joe was being self-deprecating, but that doesn't change the fact that the comment was sexist. McCain and Rove are giggling to themselves this morning as they watch their handiwork unfold.

While I mocked the Palin pick on Friday and while I still believe John McCain has gambled with the nation's security for political gain, I do not underestimate the threat of the Sarah Palin. If 50 million people can vote for George W. Bush twice, then there is no telling what they will fall for this time around.

(Cross-posted at State of the Day.)

Bridge to the Twelfth Century

By Capt. Fogg

"I told Congress, thanks but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere.” -- Gov. Sarah Palin

Nothing like starting your campaign with a lie. Of course, anyone who can't tell the difference between thanking congress for a bridge and thanking them on a bridge should be thrown off a bridge, but that's another matter. Americans don't notice such things anyway and a correct preposition might make her seem "elitist."

Fact is, support for the bridge was part of her campaign platform and although she apparently withdrew support when it turned out Alaska might have to contribute to the project, she didn't say no to the money, or on the money, as she might be expected to phrase it. She spent it elsewhere, telling Ketchikan residents she "felt their pain." Her actions hardly qualify as the kind of "cost-cutting" she claims to support as a new leader of a party that has been party to the largest deficit spending of the last 2/3 of a century and the largest most intrusive Federal government ever.

Of course, to any Republican, the past is plastic and malleable. It can be molded and shaped to create anything one likes, and indeed her personal history entry in Wikipedia was changed -- tuned up as it were, and apparently by her son the day before her selection was announced.

What reason predominated in the sclerotic mind of the Maverick when he made that selection remains a mystery, but it isn't a stretch to think that it's all about Roe v. Wade. Opposition to that by a woman seems more palatable than from another old white male Bible-thumper, but of course opposition to alternative energy and allegiance to an oil consuming empire can't be discounted.

Of course, it's more important, if one has any regard for truth, decency, justice, democracy or liberty, that these people be thwarted while there's still anything left to steal. That is if you don't value your Hummer and your Church more.