Guest post by Infidel753
Ed. note: I'm pleased to present a new guest blogger at The Reaction, Infidel753 (not his real name) of the excellent blog of the same name. I've been a fan of his for some time now, and it's a pleasure to welcome him, and to be able to provide another platform for his writing. If you're not familiar with his blog, I encourage you to check it out, which offers astute political analysis, as you'll see in this post, and some great link round-ups. His bio is below. -- MJWS.
**********
Infidel753
was born in New York state, grew up in California and now lives in
Oregon. His area of academic specialization was the Middle East. He is
a life-long atheist and long-time liberal with a special interest in
social issues and technology.
It would be nice if, someday, there were once again two parties I could consider voting for.
I know of people who think in terms of weighing the relative merits
of the Democrats and Republicans to decide which is better, as if it
were still the 1970s. I don't have the option of thinking that way, not
now.
As I've pointed out many times, what we have in this country right
now is a Christian Right party and a secular party. The Republican
party is now mostly in the hands of people who think America was founded
as a "Christian nation," who reject separation of church and state, who
want to make abortion a crime again, who view homosexuality and pretty
much any unconventional way of life as a sinful aberration to be driven
back underground if not outright banned. People who reject science, not
only in the obvious sense of rejecting the most solidly-established
fact in all of science (evolution) -- but in the broader sense of being
impervious to empirical evidence, on issues from global warming to
Keynesian economics to the effects of abstinence-only sex "education",
when it conflicts with their gut feelings and preconceived notions.
In
their version of America,
I would be a second-class citizen on at least two grounds. In their
version of America, science would shrivel from official harassment and
lack of funding every time it ran up against one of the random taboos
embraced by ignorant fundamentalism. In their version of America,
everyone who didn't aspire to live according to the conventional
family-values model* would be pushed back into hiding or into the
disguise of superficial conformity; either way, into hypocrisy and
silent misery.
This means that I don't have a choice. The Republicans are simply
not an option for me. As it happens, the Democrats are also a lot
closer to my own views on all the fiscal/economic stuff, but even if
that weren't the case -- even if it were the Republicans who favored
humane and reality-based economics while the Democrats touted
laissez-faire Randroid insanities -- it would make no difference. The
Republicans still would not be an option, not as long as they remained
under the sway of
de facto theocrats. Because if their version of America ever became reality, it wouldn't be my country any more. It wouldn't want me.
And, again: Can we afford to let someone who believes God-knows-
what about Armageddon and the "End Times" become President and get
control of 10,000 nuclear weapons? Think about it.
(An excellent source on what the right wing in the U.S. has become is
Right Wing Watch.)
In the long run, of course, they won't win. Fundamentalists are a
shrinking minority in the US, while the number of non-religious people
is growing rapidly. Even if the Republicans did gain enough power to
implement a lot of the Christian Right agenda, it wouldn't last forever.
But it might well last for a long time. Religious fanatics are a
minority in Iran, but they've been in power for 32 years now.
Eventually -- whether it takes one year or twenty -- people like
Romney and Christie will win out within the Republican party and it will
return to being a party one merely disagrees with on most things, as
opposed to being dangerously crazy. Until that happens,
it is not an option.
[*It occurred to me some time ago that this is one key difference
between primitive and modern societies. In a primitive society, there
is one standard way of life to which everyone is expected to conform. A
modern society accepts a multiplicity of possible ways of life as being
equally legitimate.]
(Cross-posted from Infidel753.)
No comments:
Post a Comment